mirror of
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git
synced 2025-04-16 12:12:25 +00:00
Minor grammatical fix to runner deletion message (#7479)
WIP until someone else tells me whether the whole message should be changed or whether `s/mark/marked/` is enough. I am honestly not sure what "It may break building workflow." means in this context either but it doesn't sound correct to me. ## Checklist *snipped* - this is really minor, please let me know if there's a better checklist to use for changes like this ### Release notes - [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. [Change is too minor] Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7479 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: voltagex <git@voltagex.org> Co-committed-by: voltagex <git@voltagex.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d46cf46f6e
commit
cb4ef4495a
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -3871,7 +3871,7 @@ runners.delete_runner = Delete this runner
|
|||
runners.delete_runner_success = Runner deleted successfully
|
||||
runners.delete_runner_failed = Failed to delete runner
|
||||
runners.delete_runner_header = Confirm to delete this runner
|
||||
runners.delete_runner_notice = If a task is running on this runner, it will be terminated and mark as failed. It may break building workflow.
|
||||
runners.delete_runner_notice = If a task is running on this runner, it will be terminated and marked as failed. It may break building workflow.
|
||||
runners.none = No runners available
|
||||
runners.status.unspecified = Unknown
|
||||
runners.status.idle = Idle
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue