Currently the `POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/contents` API endpoint accepts request without any `ChangeFileOperation.SHA`, unlike stated by the doc:
33eee199cf/modules/structs/repo_file.go (L80-L81)
This PR adds:
- some more (already passing) tests around this function
- a new (failing) test to show this wrong behavior
- a fix (note that this is a breaking change for clients exploiting this bug)
- an update for all the existing tests
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Breaking bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8139): <!--number 8139 --><!--line 0 --><!--description QVBJOiBlbmZvcmNlIHNoYSByZXF1aXJlbWVudCBvbiBgUE9TVCAvcmVwb3Mve293bmVyfS97cmVwb30vY29udGVudHNg-->API: enforce sha requirement on `POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/contents`<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8139
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
Co-committed-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
More about codespell: https://github.com/codespell-project/codespell .
I personally introduced it to dozens if not hundreds of projects already and so far only positive feedback.
```
❯ grep lint-spell Makefile
@echo " - lint-spell lint spelling"
@echo " - lint-spell-fix lint spelling and fix issues"
lint: lint-frontend lint-backend lint-spell
lint-fix: lint-frontend-fix lint-backend-fix lint-spell-fix
.PHONY: lint-spell
lint-spell: lint-codespell
.PHONY: lint-spell-fix
lint-spell-fix: lint-codespell-fix
❯ git grep lint- -- .forgejo/
.forgejo/workflows/testing.yml: - run: make --always-make -j$(nproc) lint-backend checks-backend # ensure the "go-licenses" make target runs
.forgejo/workflows/testing.yml: - run: make lint-frontend
```
so how would you like me to invoke `lint-codespell` on CI? (without that would be IMHO very suboptimal and let typos sneak in)
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3270
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
Co-committed-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
This adds a few tests for the previous change, to verify that issue
template configs, issue templates and pr templates are all recognized in
`.forgejo` directories.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
Blank Issues should be enabled if they are not explicit disabled through
the `blank_issues_enabled` field of the Issue Config. The Implementation
has currently a Bug: If you create a Issue Config file with only
`contact_links` and without a `blank_issues_enabled` field,
`blank_issues_enabled` is set to false by default.
The fix is only one line, but I decided to also improve the tests to
make sure there are no other problems with the Implementation.
This is a bugfix, so it should be backported to 1.20.
Closes#20955
This PR adds the possibility to disable blank Issues, when the Repo has
templates. This can be done by creating the file
`.gitea/issue_config.yaml` with the content `blank_issues_enabled` in
the Repo.
