Second part of #6327 to fix the Maven package naming. This pull request includes:
* Changing the group and artifact IDs from being separated by `-` to `:` as suggested by [Maven](https://maven.apache.org/pom.html#Maven_Coordinates).
* Making Maven package names case-sensitive
* Migrating the database to:
* Handle collisions of package names (e.g., groupId: foo- with artifactId: bar and groupId: foo with artifactId: -bar) by moving them into their own packages.
* Fix the missing group ID issue (#6329).
* Update lower_name to match the name value for maven pkgs to make it case-sensetive.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6352
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Julian Schlarb <julian.schlarb@denktmit.de>
Co-committed-by: Julian Schlarb <julian.schlarb@denktmit.de>
Resolves#7878
An empty repository topic was not stored consistently across databases, this caused the `ONLY_SHOW_RELEVANT_REPOS` feature to not work correctly. Always store empty repository topics as an empty array to fix this.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7920
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Maks1mS <maks1ms@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Maks1mS <maks1ms@noreply.codeberg.org>
- `testPatch` is a function that is called to test a pull request and determine the state of the pull request. Checking for merge conflicts, check if the diff is empty and if the pull request modifies any protected files.
- The checking for merge conflict and if the diff is empty used git commands that relied on a working tree to correctly functions. Forgejo store repositories in a bare format which do not contain a working tree. This means that a temporary copy was created every time a pull request had to be re-checked and for large repositories involving quite some I/O interaction.
- This patch adjusts those codepaths to instead use newer Git plumbing commands that work without requiring a work tree and can thus be used directly on the bare repository. The merge conflict is now done via [`git-merge-tree(1)`](https://git-scm.com/docs/git-merge-tree/) and checking if the diff is empty is done via [`git-diff-tree(1)`](https://git-scm.com/docs/git-diff-tree).
- If the function is called to test a patch where the head and base repository are not the same, then [Git alternate](https://git-scm.com/docs/gitglossary#Documentation/gitglossary.txt-aiddefalternateobjectdatabaseaalternateobjectdatabase) is used to make the head commit available in the base repository, this done on a per git command basis via the `GIT_ALTERNATE_OBJECT_DIRECTORIES` environment.
- As far as I can understand the documentation and the existing code, there's no edge case that the new code cannot handle. It also results in a cleaner codepath, as the existing code did a lot of checking and merging in a more traditional approach that required a lot of (parsing) code, while the new code offloads this to git and has a trivial parser of the output.
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#7701
- Added exhaustive integration testing.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7727
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Co-authored-by: Michael Jerger <michael.jerger@meissa-gmbh.de>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7203
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: zam <mirco.zachmann@meissa.de>
Co-committed-by: zam <mirco.zachmann@meissa.de>
Failing the migration when a corrupted record is found is problematic because there is no transaction and the database may need to be restored from a backup to attempt the migration again, after deleting the corrupted records.
Each documented case of failed migration was resolved by removing the corrupted records. There is no instance of a failed migration that was caused by non corrupted record.
In the unlikely event of a false negative where a two_factor record is discarded although it is in use, the only consequence is that the user will have to enroll again. Detailed logs are displayed so the Forgejo admin can file a bug report if that happens.
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/6637
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7251): <!--number 7251 --><!--line 0 --><!--description V2hlbiBtaWdyYXRpbmcgdG8gRm9yZ2VqbyB2MTAsIHRoZSBUT1RQIHNlY3JldHMgZm91bmQgdG8gYmUgY29ycnVwdGVkIGFyZSBub3cgdHJhbnNwYXJlbnRseSByZW1vdmVkIGZyb20gdGhlIGRhdGFiYXNlIGluc3RlYWQgb2YgZmFpbGluZyB0aGUgbWlncmF0aW9uLiBUT1RQIGlzIG5vIGxvbmdlciByZXF1aXJlZCB0byBsb2dpbiB3aXRoIHRoZSBhc3NvY2lhdGVkIHVzZXJzLiBUaGV5IHNob3VsZCBiZSBpbmZvcm1lZCBiZWNhdXNlIHRoZXkgd2lsbCBuZWVkIHRvIHZpc2l0IHRoZWlyIHNlY3VyaXR5IHNldHRpbmdzIGFuZCBjb25maWd1cmUgVE9UUCBhZ2Fpbi4gTm8gb3RoZXIgYWN0aW9uIGlzIHJlcXVpcmVkLg==-->When migrating to Forgejo v10, the TOTP secrets found to be corrupted are now transparently removed from the database instead of failing the migration. TOTP is no longer required to login with the associated users. They should be informed because they will need to visit their security settings and configure TOTP again. No other action is required.<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7251
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
## Dropping SSPI auth support
SSPI authentication relied on Microsoft Windows support, removal started in https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/5353, because it was broken anyway. We have no knowledge of any users using SSPI authentication. However, if you somehow managed to run Forgejo on Windows, or want to upgrade from a Gitea version which does, please ensure that you do not use SSPI as an authentication mechanism for user accounts. Feel free to reach out if you need assistance.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7148
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Otto Richter <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Otto Richter <otto@codeberg.org>
Using SELECT `%s` FROM `%s` WHERE 0 = 1 to assert the existence of a column is simple but noisy: it shows errors in the migrations that are confusing for Forgejo admins because they are not actual errors.
Use introspection instead, which is more complicated but leads to the same result.
Add a test that ensures it works as expected, for all database types. Although the migration is run for all database types, it does not account for various scenarios and is never tested in the case a column does not exist.
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/6583
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6591
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Some database fields were added in the database to facilitate
migration from Gitea and do not serve any purpose. Drop them since
v1.22 is the last version of the database to allow a transparent
migration to Forgejo.
- Currently the TOTP secrets are stored using the `secrets` module with
as key the MD5 hash of the Secretkey, the `secrets` module uses general
bad practices. This patch migrates the secrets to use the `keying`
module (#5041) which is easier to use and use better practices to store
secrets in databases.
- Migration test added.
- Remove the Forgejo migration databases, and let the gitea migration
databases also run forgejo migration databases. This is required as the
Forgejo migration is now also touching tables that the forgejo migration
didn't create itself.
Introduce "idNumber" for each migration, and clarify the difference
between the migration ID number and database version.
---
Conflict resolution: trivial
(cherry picked from commit d70af38447a759d4a935e315e18efa4dd625f655)
Part of #24256.
Clear up old action logs to free up storage space.
Users will see a message indicating that the log has been cleared if
they view old tasks.
<img width="1361" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9f0f3a3a-bc5a-402f-90ca-49282d196c22">
Docs: https://gitea.com/gitea/docs/pulls/40
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
(cherry picked from commit 687c1182482ad9443a5911c068b317a91c91d586)
Conflicts:
custom/conf/app.example.ini
routers/web/repo/actions/view.go
trivial context conflict
Fixes#22722
Currently, it is not possible to force push to a branch with branch
protection rules in place. There are often times where this is necessary
(CI workflows/administrative tasks etc).
The current workaround is to rename/remove the branch protection,
perform the force push, and then reinstate the protections.
Provide an additional section in the branch protection rules to allow
users to specify which users with push access can also force push to the
branch. The default value of the rule will be set to `Disabled`, and the
UI is intuitive and very similar to the `Push` section.
It is worth noting in this implementation that allowing force push does
not override regular push access, and both will need to be enabled for a
user to force push.
This applies to manual force push to a remote, and also in Gitea UI
updating a PR by rebase (which requires force push)
This modifies the `BranchProtection` API structs to add:
- `enable_force_push bool`
- `enable_force_push_whitelist bool`
- `force_push_whitelist_usernames string[]`
- `force_push_whitelist_teams string[]`
- `force_push_whitelist_deploy_keys bool`
<img width="943" alt="image"
src="7491899c-d816-45d5-be84-8512abd156bf">
branch `test` being a protected branch:
<img width="1038" alt="image"
src="57ead13e-9006-459f-b83c-7079e6f4c654">
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 12cb1d2998f2a307713ce979f8d585711e92061c)
- Go's deadcode eliminator is quite simple, if you put a public function
in a package `aa/bb` that is used only by tests, it would still be built
if package `aa/bb` was imported. This means that if such functions use
libraries relevant only to tests that those libraries would still be
be built and increase the binary size of a Go binary.
- This is also the case with Forgejo, `models/migrations/base/tests.go`
contained functions exclusively used by tests which (skipping some steps
here) imports https://github.com/ClickHouse/clickhouse-go, which is
2MiB. The `code.gitea.io/gitea/models/migrations/base` package is
imported by `cmd/doctor` and thus the code of the clickhouse library is
also built and included in the Forgejo binary, although entirely unused
and not reachable.
- This patch moves the test-related functions to their own package, so
Go's deadcode eliminator knows not to build the test-related functions
and thus reduces the size of the Forgejo binary.
- It is not possible to move this to a `_test.go` file because Go does
not allow importing functions from such files, so any test helper
function must be in a non-test package and file.
- Reduction of size (built with `TAGS="sqlite sqlite_unlock_notify" make
build`):
- Before: 95912040 bytes (92M)
- After: 92306888 bytes (89M)
fixes#22907
Tested:
- [x] issue content edit
- [x] issue content change tasklist
- [x] pull request content edit
- [x] pull request change tasklist
(cherry picked from commit aa92b13164e84c26be91153b6022220ce0a27720)
Conflicts:
models/issues/comment.go
c7a389f2b2 [FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments
options/locale/locale_en-US.ini
trivial context conflicts
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment.go
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment_attachment.go
services/issue/comments.go
services/issue/content.go
user blocking is implemented differently in Forgejo
routers/web/repo/issue.go
trivial difference from 6a0750177f Allow to save empty comment
user blocking is implemented differently in Forgejo
templates/repo/issue/view_content/conversation.tmpl
templates changed a lot in Forgejo but the change is
trivially ported
tests/integration/issue_test.go
other tests were added in the same region
web_src/js/features/repo-issue-edit.js
the code is still web_src/js/features/repo-legacy.js
trivially ported
This PR split the `Board` into two parts. One is the struct has been
renamed to `Column` and the second we have a `Template Type`.
But to make it easier to review, this PR will not change the database
schemas, they are just renames. The database schema changes could be in
future PRs.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
(cherry picked from commit 98751108b11dc748cc99230ca0fc1acfdf2c8929)
Conflicts:
docs/content/administration/config-cheat-sheet.en-us.md
docs/content/index.en-us.md
docs/content/installation/comparison.en-us.md
docs/content/usage/permissions.en-us.md
non existent files
options/locale/locale_en-US.ini
routers/web/web.go
templates/repo/header.tmpl
templates/repo/settings/options.tmpl
trivial context conflicts
Fix#30872
We will assume the database is consistent before executing the
migration. So the indexes should exist. Removing `IF EXIST` then is safe
enough.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
(cherry picked from commit 40de54ece82356b161cdb9cc224ed9004af8ae5d)
Conflicts:
models/migrations/v1_22/v286.go
MSSQL is not supported in Forgejo
More about codespell: https://github.com/codespell-project/codespell .
I personally introduced it to dozens if not hundreds of projects already and so far only positive feedback.
```
❯ grep lint-spell Makefile
@echo " - lint-spell lint spelling"
@echo " - lint-spell-fix lint spelling and fix issues"
lint: lint-frontend lint-backend lint-spell
lint-fix: lint-frontend-fix lint-backend-fix lint-spell-fix
.PHONY: lint-spell
lint-spell: lint-codespell
.PHONY: lint-spell-fix
lint-spell-fix: lint-codespell-fix
❯ git grep lint- -- .forgejo/
.forgejo/workflows/testing.yml: - run: make --always-make -j$(nproc) lint-backend checks-backend # ensure the "go-licenses" make target runs
.forgejo/workflows/testing.yml: - run: make lint-frontend
```
so how would you like me to invoke `lint-codespell` on CI? (without that would be IMHO very suboptimal and let typos sneak in)
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3270
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
Co-committed-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
Ref: Propose to restart 1.22 release #30501
(cherry picked from commit 6d2a307ad8af7d686f1c3a3706ff0f2df895658a)
Conflicts:
models/migrations/migrations.go
models/migrations/v1_22/v297.go
trivial conflict because a migration does not exist in Forgejo
Fix https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/23894#discussion_r1573718690
(cherry picked from commit 2ad9ef4984f0b68ef38241fd6b557d8427d851d8)
Conflicts:
models/migrations/v1_16/v210.go
models/migrations/v1_22/v286.go
trivial conflicts because MSSQL is no longer supported
Replace #6312
Help #5833
Wiki solution for #639
(cherry picked from commit 3feba9f1f44156c256a30d25ad1c25f751819c94)
Conflicts:
Trash everything, just keep the migration placeholder to ensure the Gitea
sequence is preserved. The Wiki edition is implemented differently.
Noteable additions:
- `redefines-builtin-id` forbid variable names that shadow go builtins
- `empty-lines` remove unnecessary empty lines that `gofumpt` does not
remove for some reason
- `superfluous-else` eliminate more superfluous `else` branches
Rules are also sorted alphabetically and I cleaned up various parts of
`.golangci.yml`.
(cherry picked from commit 74f0c84fa4245a20ce6fb87dac1faf2aeeded2a2)
Conflicts:
.golangci.yml
apply the linter recommendations to Forgejo code as well
The target_url is necessary for the UI, but missed in
commit_status_summary table. This PR fix it.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
This PR adds a new table named commit status summary to reduce queries
from the commit status table. After this change, commit status summary
table will be used for the final result, commit status table will be for
details.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
- It was only used to parse old U2F data to webauthn credentials. We
only used the public key and keyhandle. This functiontionality was
reworked to `parseU2FRegistration`.
- Tests are already present, `Test_RemigrateU2FCredentials`.
Fix https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/29874#discussion_r1542227686
- The migration of v292 will miss many projects. These projects will
have no default board. This PR introduced a new migration number and
removed v292 migration.
- This PR also added the missed transactions on project-related
operations.
- Only `SetDefaultBoard` will remove duplicated defaults but not in
`GetDefaultBoard`
(cherry picked from commit 40cdc84b368cce8328b4b49ea5ecf1c5fa040300)
On creation of an empty project (no template) a default board will be
created instead of falling back to the uneditable pseudo-board.
Every project now has to have exactly one default boards. As a
consequence, you cannot unset a board as default, instead you have to
set another board as default. Existing projects will be modified using a
cron job, additionally this check will run every midnight by default.
Deleting the default board is not allowed, you have to set another board
as default to do it.
Fixes#29873Fixes#14679 along the way
Fixes#29853
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
(cherry picked from commit e5160185ed65fd1c2bcb2fc7dc7e0b5514ddb299)
Conflicts:
options/locale/locale_en-US.ini
trivial conflict because Forgejo strings do not have
surrounding double quotes
Because the `git` module did not recognize SSH signed tags, those
signatures ended up in the `notes` column of the `release` table. While
future signatures will not end up there, Forgejo should clean up the old
ones.
This migration does just that: finds all releases that have an SSH
signature, and removes those signatures, preserving the rest of the
note (if any).
While this may seem like an expensive operation, it's only done once,
and even on the largest known Forgejo instance as of this
writing (Codeberg), the number of affected rows are just over a hundred,
a tiny amount all things considered.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
